Fuelled by social and traditional media, cancel culture has seen no sign of decline in 2023. Numerous victims have come under fire for speaking or acting in a way that threatens the collective consciousness, resulting in damage to their reputation or career, loss of earnings, and in severe cases, mental health deterioration and trauma. While cancel culture can help ensure damaging and discriminatory behaviour and speech are not tolerated in society, some argue that the trend has gone too far. With the criteria for cancellation seemingly narrowing, and ever more individuals and companies falling prey to the phenomenon, there is arguably a risk of cancel culture creating a polarised society in which critical thinking and open debate become lost.
Cancel culture and collective consciousness
A slew of famous names have been cancelled in the past year or two, including Will Smith after that slap; Kanye West for a series of opinions which many perceived as containing anti-Semitic sentiment; Jeremy Clarkson for his anti-Meghan-Markle hate speech; Philip Schofield after it emerged he had lied about a relationship with a younger member of staff; and recently, Strictly’s Amanda Abbington for being perceived as transphobic due to the emergence of a historical tweet. While some of these famous names have bounced back more easily than others, all have been subjected to a damaging public backlash.
So what makes the public and the media react so strongly when someone in the public eye acts or speaks in a way they don’t approve of? Sociologist Émile Durkheim coined the phrase “collective consciousness” back in 1893, to define the way that people’s shared beliefs and values create an unwritten blueprint for interacting in society, uniting people and leading to social integration. This powerful shared ideology is fiercely protected and reinforced by individuals within the society – and a modern-day example can be seen in today’s phenomenon of cancel culture.
Collective consciousness provides a sense of belonging, security, strength and unity. Anything that threatens it is therefore rejected strongly – as we see in cancel culture cases in which social media furores and newspaper backlashes erupt when a famous individual or company is perceived to have broken the rules of society, whether deliberately or inadvertently.
A similar phenomenon is that of the “collective mental state”, a term used in philosophy and sociology to describe a situation where a mental state is shared across a large group. While some manifestations of a collective mental state can be enjoyable and positive – such as a united crowd of strangers enjoying a large music concert – others can be more damaging.
When the punishment doesn’t fit the crime
An aggressive collective mental state known as mob mentality occurs when anger amplifies and spreads through a group, resulting in acts of aggression by individuals in the group as they become whipped up in a frenzy of rage. It is this type of mob mentality that is often seen in cases of cancel culture, and the effects on those targeted can be severe, as we saw in the case of TV presenter Caroline Flack, who sadly ended her life in 2020 after being the subject of intense and prolonged media scrutiny and social media criticism.
A more recent case of cancel culture affected actor and Strictly Come Dancing contestant Amanda Abbington, after a historical tweet she wrote some years ago resurfaced and was interpreted as being transphobic. After heavy criticism, she left Twitter (now called X), saying the platform was infiltrated by those looking to “pit people off of each other and cause as much harm as possible.”
Abbington did her best to make amends and address the criticism against her, saying, “I made a stupid comment a few years ago. I was ill-informed. I apologised and did my research and I’m much more informed now. I’ve said stupid things, of course I have, and instantly regretted them. Everybody is learning.” But despite this willingness to apologise and learn, criticism continued, and Amanda pulled out of Strictly part-way through the series citing “personal reasons”.
How cancel culture polarises society
As well as the profound impact cancel culture has on the individuals affected, there are also implications for society. In a 2022 survey from the Policy Institute at King’s College London and Ipsos UK, 54 per cent of people said the UK population is becoming more polarised due to “culture wars”.
In an environment where alternative views are widely and strongly criticised, and people are punished by an unforgiving and vocal public judge and jury for speaking against the collective voice, it is becoming evident that this culture of vilifying individuals could be a threat to freedom of expression, learning, and open discussion. Cancel culture can drown out a diversity of voices, which is potentially damaging in a globalised, multicultural world.
Cancel culture and the effect on brands and companies
It’s not just individuals who fall victim to cancel culture – companies and brands have also frequently been affected by criticism and boycotts after online and media backlashes. Whether cancellation is aimed at a company, its board members or even its stakeholders, it can be damaging.
Today’s companies need to be aware of society’s expectations from them to avoid a faux pas that leads to their cancellation. Monitoring trends and conversations online, and researching cultural sensitivity, now form a vital part of successful business strategy.
Cancel culture has its positive side: it can protect marginalised communities by calling out old-fashioned or discriminatory views, and influence positive change in areas such as eliminating corporate greenwashing and questionable business practices. But with the darker side of cancel culture becoming increasingly apparent, perhaps it’s time to do more to avoid damage to individuals and a polarised society.
Privacy Policy.
Revoke consent.
© Digitalis Media Ltd. Privacy Policy.
Digitalis
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email webrequests@digitalis.com
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to webrequests@digitalis.com