In today’s digital society, it has never been easier to purchase products, services, and pretty much anything else the heart desires, at the click of a button. But what consumers have gained in convenience, they have lost in terms of in-person quality control – feeling the calibre of fabric between their fingers or being reassured by an informed and persuasive salesperson. In this vacuum, online reviews have become an integral part of the purchasing process, particularly for large-ticket items, as individuals seek validation in the form of testimonials attesting to the quality and authenticity of what they are about to buy.
While word-of-mouth recommendations still carry some weight, they aren’t always suitable, relevant, or available. You may not know someone who has needed the specific product or service you are after, it may be a discreet or confidential purchase, or time might be of the essence and an immediate and impartial temperature check is required. The aforementioned technological revolution means that, in the same way the purchasing process has become easier, so too has soliciting wider opinion on the exact acquisition you intend to make.
Deal or no deal
Take Amazon, one of the world’s largest retailers, as a case in point. Amazon features customer reviews front and centre to help inform purchasing decisions. However, according to some sources, as many as a third of reviews of top products on the website could be fake. These insincere appraisals usually take one of two main forms: brands fabricating reviews to boost their own reputation or intentionally spreading disinformation about a rival in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage.
The advancement of AI means it’s never been easier for brands to disseminate inauthentic reviews, rendering it no longer necessary to enlist humans as bad actors to execute a black hat campaign. Google is often the first port of call for any online journey – including potential purchases – and as a result its own reviews have come to be trusted by users. While not a failsafe to prevent those acting with untrue intentions, there is a verification process required before reviews can be posted, which is likely to deter more casual nitpickers. However, according to research by AI detection software provider Originality.ai, the proportion of AI-generated reviews on Google grew by a huge 279% from 2019 to 2024 and increased from 12% in 2023 to 19% in 2024.
AI reviews differ from outright fake testimonials in that a percentage of them may not be entirely fabricated as much as being originally drafted by humans, then finessed or improved by the technology available. But it is important from an ethical and transparency standpoint that companies distinguish between human reviews and ones that have been artificially generated. Seasoned shoppers may be able to tell the difference between the two, but occasional online users are likely to require a little more assistance. It’s a delicate matter for companies too; being authentic and gaining consumer trust is a difficult process, but losing this confidence is far easier.
Counting the cost
The ultimate impact – not to mention cost – of fake reviews is borne not just by companies themselves should they be exposed, but also by the consumers who are hoodwinked into buying inferior products or services in the first place. It is impossible to quantify the full financial harm of fake reviews – not least because a large percentage of consumers who have been misled are likely to be too embarrassed to admit to being deceived – but it is likely to amount to billions of pounds globally. The same economic analysis that calculated this estimation of the potential consumer harm caused by review fraud – carried out by The Transparency Company, a tech firm which uses AI to detect inauthentic reviews – also estimated that the average US household suffers losses of $2,385 (£1,778) on an annual basis.
An additional layer of complexity regarding the realm of online reviews is the way that online search behaviour is changing, with younger generations in particular more likely to turn to large language models (LLMs) than traditional search engines. That being the case – and given the previously referenced rise in AI reviews – we have essentially arrived at a point where we are asking robots themselves to identify their bot brethren, a somewhat Orwellian scenario. Studies in this area are understandably scarce given the relative infancy of LLMs, but early analysis suggests chatbots struggle just as much as humans to ascertain which online reviews are genuine.
Caveat emptor
Whether you are researching your latest holiday or simply sussing out how reliable a Vinted vendor is, the age-old principle of ‘buyer beware’ applies to all purchases – online or in-person. Always apply critical thinking to every scenario and bear in mind that if something appears too good to be true, it most likely is. Seek reviews from a variety of sources and cross-reference them with each other to check for inconsistencies that may appear.
From a brand perspective, authenticity and transparency are bywords that businesses often live by, and it’s no different when it comes to testimonials. While businesses shouldn’t automatically assume every negative review is inspired by an ulterior motive from a conniving competitor, it has never been more important for brands to be mindful of the threat that online reviews can represent, as well as the potential opportunities.
Privacy Policy.
Revoke consent.
© Digitalis Media Ltd. Privacy Policy.
Digitalis
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email webrequests@digitalis.com
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to webrequests@digitalis.com